Human Powered Helicopter Lifts Off

Last summer a team of engineering students from the Clark School of Engineering at the University of Maryland created a human-powered helicopter called Gamera, they managed to get it off the ground and keep it aloft for 11 seconds. However their new model, the Gamera 2 managed to stay airborne for a solid 50 seconds, smashing the world record.

The Gamera II has been improved from its predecessor in many ways. It is 105 feet across, and each of the four rotors are 42 feet long. Thanks to the weight saving benefits of carbon fibre the entire helicopter weighs just 32 kilos, which is over 13 kilos lighter than the previous design.

Related posts

234 Comments

  1. Benswan187 said:

    I’d love to see Sir Chris Hoy on this bad boy!

  2. Chinesemastermind said:

    imagine this with an electric motor and perhaps pedal assist witht he right gearing so to keep up with the motor rpm. I think electric pedal assist is what we should concentrate on. I have figured human power alone won’t do it but i could be wrong.

  3. James Lewis said:

    Is it using some kind of gyro control of the rotor pitch to control attitude, or are there people holding it stable?

  4. James Lewis said:

    Is it using some kind of gyro control of the rotor pitch to control attitude, or are there people holding it stable?

  5. KeifWomble said:

    would be nice to see an original idea, not a Yuri II replica (i know it’s probably structured differently etc), well done all the same.

  6. KeifWomble said:

    would be nice to see an original idea, not a Yuri II replica (i know it’s probably structured differently etc), well done all the same.

  7. KeifWomble said:

    the competition requires a height of 3metres, i.e out of ground effect

  8. KeifWomble said:

    optimised ratio for rotor rpm. More ratios, more weight.

  9. harvpila said:

    you spend more than thousands of dollars just to lift that thing 5 inches from than ground…oh well,anyways that seems to be a good cardio work out …

  10. harvpila said:

    you spend more than thousands of dollars just to lift that thing 5 inches from than ground…oh well,anyways that seems to be a good cardio work out …

  11. WENIDON said:

    w w w.officialworldrecord. com OFFICIAL WORLD RECORD

  12. vettefreak90 said:

    fixed ratio seems kind of archaic…

  13. 16982161 said:

    hey at least it gets off the ground and stays off it

  14. watcheryoume said:

    wow that did not look safe for the guys in the middle

  15. albedoshader said:

    Birds use the ground effect too. Are those birds that do this unable to fly too?

  16. Peter Rippe said:

    “it doesn’t really fly, it uses ground effect”. in short, it really does fly. lift is lift.

  17. Peter Rippe said:

    “it doesn’t really fly, it uses ground effect”. in short, it really does fly. lift is lift.

  18. peterrippe said:

    “it doesn’t really fly, it uses ground effect”. in short, it really does fly. lift is lift.

  19. Nuno Gonçalves said:

    Ground effect is real. But since this ship have HUGE wings (rotating wings), the ground effect will be felt up to a few meters, so they might achieve their goal!

  20. nunojpg said:

    Ground effect is real. But since this ship have HUGE wings (rotating wings), the ground effect will be felt up to a few meters, so they might achieve their goal!

  21. Nuno Gonçalves said:

    Sorry, you read it wrong. I was replying to another comment, about the comparison with regular bicycles. Sitting bikes are “very inefficient in terms of aerodynamic and human energy use.”. The second part of my comment is about the “sitting position” used for this purpose, which looks very adequate!

  22. nunojpg said:

    Sorry, you read it wrong. I was replying to another comment, about the comparison with regular bicycles. Sitting bikes are “very inefficient in terms of aerodynamic and human energy use.”. The second part of my comment is about the “sitting position” used for this purpose, which looks very adequate!

  23. kubarebo said:

    You obviously have no clue what kind of engineering went into that thing. It is, in fact, the most aerodynamically and energy-use-wise human powered helicopter ever in existence. If they wanted to power it from about a dozen laptop batteries, it could stay aloft for an hour.

  24. kubarebo said:

    You obviously have no clue what kind of engineering went into that thing. It is, in fact, the most aerodynamically and energy-use-wise human powered helicopter ever in existence. If they wanted to power it from about a dozen laptop batteries, it could stay aloft for an hour.

  25. Balen Azez said:

    it did fly, and it did beautifully. A “ground effect” is a feeling, an experience felt by humans, an effect, not an actually incident; you should probably read more about “ground effect”! :)

  26. balen azez said:

    it did fly, and it did beautifully. A “ground effect” is a feeling, an experience felt by humans, an effect, not an actually incident; you should probably read more about “ground effect”! :)

  27. Nuno Gonçalves said:

    Very inefficient in terms of aerodynamic and human energy use. What matters here is short term power, and obviously hands can boost a little the legs power…

  28. nunojpg said:

    Very inefficient in terms of aerodynamic and human energy use. What matters here is short term power, and obviously hands can boost a little the legs power…

  29. Evi1M4chine said:

    Why the awkward, very inefficient sitting position? Normal bicycles are more efficient than sitting ones for a reason.

  30. Evi1M4chine said:

    Why the awkward, very inefficient sitting position? Normal bicycles are more efficient than sitting ones for a reason.

  31. pchazard said:

    Now get Coleman to pedal that shit and you can cross the Mississippi

  32. murcie888 said:

    Shouldn’t he be positioned more upright so he can get his body weight into that bitch?

  33. jim l said:

    Where is the Video of your Build then?

  34. taofledermaus said:

    That’s a pretty awesome creation!

  35. av8rdav said:

    That’s why the Sikorsky prize requires it to hover 9 meters high. There’s no practical use for this.

  36. Tim Pedersen said:

    The people that troll these videos are the same people that say Curiosity is a waste of money.

  37. timpedersen said:

    The people that troll these videos are the same people that say Curiosity is a waste of money.

  38. OnnomonnomonnO said:

    it woultn’t fly to any hight above 1 meter…air pressure above ground is bigger….if it would fly even 50cm higher, pressure would decrease….so that’s why it didn’t continue in rising up:…..the same with high speed pc fans….it would rise few milimeters above ground but that’s all…..ground effect

  39. gingernutbumchin said:

    Gliding isn’t flying then aswel right if your using the updraft of wind up a cliff to keep you in the air? Ground effect is an effect of low flight.

  40. dubtafoo said:

    They should have positioned the hand crank lower. Circulation of blood is reduced in the current position (for that pilot) so the arms will tire very quicklly. I would also suggest a horizontal configuration using a pulley and such that a rowing action can be used .. But that may add to the complexity and weight.

  41. mmcristi1981 said:

    Look, it’s flying… is it a bird? Is it a plane ?? No it’s the “make you extremely tired in 50 seconds and barely hover at 5 cm above the ground flying aparatus and a very tired cyclist”

  42. YouNewbTR said:

    What’s up with all the hateful reactions? The Dwights’ brothers first plane didn’t last that long either. These students build the future! Thanks to inventions like this one here, we could be flying our own 1 person-helicopters. Give them some support folks!

  43. quincyonq said:

    I jumped off my grandma’s house with a bed sheet when I was a kid & stayed up longer than that

  44. thepantherx12 said:

    Helicopters weigh several tons, the blades would have to shift more air to compensate for that XD

  45. monnoracing said:

    If you have not considered it or tried it you might. All it would take is to have a custom wheel made for the one without cranks on it. I have two reasons to believe this would help. 1 it will help sustain rpm and 2 it will keep the rider from having choppy pedal strokes giving a pulse like response to the machine. Think about it try it.

  46. TwisTTooL1 said:

    Wow.. Talk about a work out. Wonder if the pilot enjoyed the flight.. Nice work

  47. deksam101 said:

    Hmmm… this is nothing new, in fact, Fred Flintstone and Barney Rubble flew a much simpler and more affective peddle powered copter back in the stone ages for a very long time as I recall.

  48. Matrix29bear said:

    Blade propulsion, the least energy efficient method of flight.Balloons are efficient in terms of energy (buoyancy lift), but waste space in terms of square footage.Jets are fastest, but burn fuel at rates far exceeding blade propulsion.A flywheel powering a generator/battery combo would yield stable temporary energy if powering buoyancy liftoff sources plus blade propulsion for lateral movement.”Powered Parachute” flight is highest in efficiency, but can fail fatally in cross winds.

  49. anthony peralta said:

    I think this is fake because the blades are not even moving fast.Do you ever see a helicopers blades moving this slow and it hovering.

  50. Dennis Crow said:

    Chuck Norris would jump up, kick at the Earth to get it spinning and stop where he wanted to land, after the Earth spun around the number of times that he decided was enough.

  51. Rakemaan said:

    If he needs to supply 1hp to keep the rotors at speed, it remains 1hp whether he has a 10lb or 1000lb flywheel. The rotors are enormous flywheels and any additional flywheel would only add weight and transmission losses. If you mean powering up the flywheel on the ground then releasing the power at a greater-than-human rate, that would work better but probably breaks the human-powered rule.

  52. plcollins1 said:

    If, as I expect, this is in large part a course study project, I applaud those who dreamed up this endeavour as the student target. Being highly innovative – though of course by iteration of existing technology as are all inventions to some degree – it both educates the team and advances the state of the art. These students are learning how to be more innovative engineers, those on whom the whole world depends for our great modern way of life.

  53. VRagusila said:

    Derision4u, make it, dont just talking about it. The prize is 250000$, so it is worth it.

  54. MrRotorcraft said:

    Great job Team Gamera. Someone noted that arms and legs are only good for about 500 watts. I have produced over 800 watts and I’m not at peak fitness. What you see here is basically a skirtless hovercraft. Three meters will take energy storage in the rotor mass then release it with increased angle of attack. There will be flight duration or height records but not both at the same time. Again great job Team Gamera.

  55. CecilitaBonita said:

    Yeah college park! I bet if they had one of those Jimmy John’s delivery drivers on there! :) Good work though!

  56. straycatj said:

    Further, it is impossible to predict the ways in which this kind of thing can ultimately benefit mankind, unless you are God. Many human achievements and new technologies (even those thought to be purely academic) benefited mankind in ways that remained unidentified until long after the achievement.

  57. straycatj said:

    They are benefiting mankind merely by pursuing something peaceful and not participating in the kind of sports and entertainment that are indeed currently destroying mankind. They are generating interest in something that is noble and non-violent. They are working as a team to ignite the imagination of millions of people with their pursuit of the Sikorsky Prize.

  58. Deathtax81 said:

    God forbid that those talented people direct their efforts to an endeavor that would actually benefit man kind.

  59. JBashover said:

    As an avid cyclist, the ergonomics of any pedal-driven device can make a huge difference in output efficiency. With some tweaks I think U of M team can easily get to the 60 second mark. Congrats on the great show!

  60. coolwave9119 said:

    Ok so this helicopter is 1hp (human power) right? :) ) tell me again when you build the 1000hp one :D

  61. stonerscolony said:

    and the wrong weight, he would be too heavy and it would get altitude. Look at the guys build in the video and how high he got at that body weight.

  62. Erik2coixos said:

    It is comparing appels and oranges, but i give you credit of some sort as someone else comented like; just put a engine in it.

  63. RevengeOfOtown said:

    Yes it is a ” scientific breakthrough” but it is no Gossamer Condor, albeit a step in the right direction.

  64. zero00tolerance said:

    Yes thanks for the info Ive seen it a while ago it is amazing achievement; as for this machine and timing I rather think it’s too overrated. Description ” flew for 50 seconds! ” Have a good day.

  65. johnpetermalcolm said:

    The human powered aircraft “Gossamer Albatros”; flew the English Channel (22.2 miles) on the 12th June 1979, taking 2 hours 49 minutes.

  66. Erik2coixos said:

    How wonderful !! As science wil come up with even lichter and stronger materials; the sky wil no longer be the limit!! And as all trolls that only can come up with negative dribble on all these videos of marvalous scientific breakthrougs will hopfully kill themselfs soon (the only positive thing they could do) The surviving good fibe will push science to even bigger milestones.

  67. Derision4u said:

    All methods of flight are based off an exchange of expending energy through drag in the prop blades and wings, but my method applies most of that energy into creating thrust/lift using special max angle of attack prop mechanisms, whereas all traditional methods waste the majority of motor energy by producing several times more rotational prop drag than forward thrust/lift. My method is literally using the drag force on the prop blades as direct mechanical leverage for lift/thrust.

  68. Sam Tarly said:

    JoyofSatan(dot)com CHRISTIANITY EXPOSED AS FALSE AT THIS LINK. SATAN PROVEN TO BE OUR REAL CREATOR GOD THROUGH GENETIC ENGINEERING. LEARN HOW TO CONTACT SATAN.

  69. zero00tolerance said:

    LOL true… this weakling dude… probably study and gaming all days…they probably picked him because he is the most prominent in the group. 50 seconds record for human flight, wow that’s pathetic..

  70. Derision4u said:

    My research has gone beyond anything I’ve seen or ever heard of online. I’ve figured out that a prop system involving a 90 degree angle of attack in a linear motion with two plate-shaped props can have an 80% efficiency of motor HP input to /liftthrust HP output. Flying VTOL cars, perfect VTOL jetpacks, you name it- would all be possible and practical with this new method of flight.If I could build a prototype of a human-powered version of this it would only weigh 20 lbs and win the Sikorsky.

  71. br0tt said:

    To all website and blog owners and visitors:Proxyu.eu is a free, fast and anonymous web proxy we also want to help you increase your traffic with a free backlink !exchange links at Proxyu.eu/links/

  72. ayresbaed said:

    Thank you for what I’m sure was a very well-researched and informed comment. I look forward to seeing your opinions and research in future aerospace publications.

  73. L3G1TN3SSxFTW said:

    It would go higher but unless you strap a motor to that thing, it’s not going to go 200 ft.

  74. pekeqpeke said:

    this thing flies more like a hovercraft than a helicopter… hover in ground effect is nothing compared to actual hover.but great achievement nonetheless

  75. Derision4u said:

    You are so full of shit, it hurts. First of all, it’s not strong enough- it’s already broken with minimal use; it’s a fragile piece of shit that’s not going to ever be practical for human-powered flight as otherwise it will be too heavy for that. Second- it is utterly USELESS for conventional aircraft, as it relies almost exclusively on an extreme ground effect and has no use for anything that needs to go more than two feet off the ground.

  76. panthermanify said:

    *******if u want free psn,itunes,xbox giftcard***********then download bamboo wallet from app store and i f u have andriod phone then dwonload juno wallet from playstore after singup in junowallet or bamboo wallet enter this invite code “AJ473212″ then u get 0.25$.after that if u are apple user then go to (r . junowallet . com) and login with same id and pass and then complete all intsall and run offers :)

  77. ayresbaed said:

    Aside from being an awe-inspiring proof of concept, this project has numerous applications. To my knowledge, personal human-powered aircraft – the one you seem to find ridiculous – is not one of them.Creating a structure strong enough for flight but light enough for a human to power requires you to completely rethink how aircraft are designed. The know-how and techniques that made this flight possible are incredibly promising for improving the efficiency and strength of conventional aircraft.

  78. imrotting said:

    Oh, the definition of a helicopter. How about the definition of the word “Practical”? The best designs are the simplest, but they are also ones that work and are practical. If you are going to have something controlled by “brain waves” which is a ridiculous idea, then you are going to need computers, and that means a parasitic generator for the electricity to run the generator or the added weight of solar panels, servo motors etc.. anyone can design something impractical and useless like this…

  79. dubtafoo said:

    I’ll bet you’ve never designed or built anything in your life. The definition of helicopter incorporates none of the things you claim it does. As far as I’m concerned, this is a helicopter. In the future, a control system for moving forward and turning by slowing 1 or 2 rotors based on something that uses brain waves can probably be implemented with very little weight cost. Someone like Lance Armstrong may be able to fly it for 10 minutes, which is enough to get across a gator infested moat.

  80. imrotting said:

    How is that a helicopter? I would call it a hovering platform at best. Does nothing but go up and down. When someone builds one that can go up, the pilot can turn it and travel in any direction they choose, then you will have a helicopter. This thing does not even look like it would have any stability to stay upright or do anything in a breeze but get torn apart.

  81. chucku00 said:

    With the right fuel, you can always do what you want…Neil Armstrong could have written this quote.

  82. Ogabill said:

    Flintstones, Meet the Flintstones They’re a modern stone age family ♫

  83. aed939 said:

    An upright cyclist can shift his bodyweight from pedal to pedal thus working with gravity to drive the pedals–especially in sprints and climbs while standing (not seated). A recumbant cyclist relies solely on power derived through muscular contraction. The hand pedals are not going to help either since the limiting factor is the work capacity of the cyclist. The extra set of gears and pedals just add weight.

  84. shav4life said:

    In the future airliners will ask passengers to pedal for them, they are the new efficient and green air crafts of the 22nd Century.

  85. TheKen707 said:

    Do you honestly expect these same people to have ever even heard the word derision, let alone understand its meaning? I agree with you btw, but you probably figured that out by now :) Cheers mate.

  86. sleepib said:

    The only reason it’s flying at all is ground effect, which provides stabilization and extra lift.

  87. subductionzone said:

    How a professional biker sits is limited by the equipment he has to use, for example recumbent bicycles are illegal, and by the fact that professional cyclists cannot use their arms to power their vehicles.

  88. laputahayom said:

    look up a blog called dot physics he looks at this. wired.com/wiredscience/2012/06/how-hard-is-the-human-powered-helicopter/

  89. VitaliyHaimFutornyy said:

    Мечтать! Летать! И думать о прекрасном! Во сне касаться звезд и облаков! И верить в то, что это не напрасно, что в жизни нашей будет любовь! Надеяться на Чудо, верить в Сказку! Любить друг друга, и тепло дарить! И жить по настоящему, без маски. Смеяться. Плакать. И судьбу творить! Дарить друг другу радость и улыбку. От счастья плакать, от любви пылать! И не бояться совершать ошибку. Весь опыт жизни в мудрость превращать!

  90. fenix9885 said:

    You have to start somewhere and all advanced technologies start with simple tests that don’t seem significant on their own. But in the totality of everything, down the road this might be the catalyst of something great

  91. oavel24 said:

    So what’s the point of all that? No controls at all, just brute power. Well there is one good point actually it’s a good exercise highly recommend to all the americans, most of whom won’t last even 10 seconds -)

  92. gatraw said:

    lol get someone in there that actually has strong legs and arms

  93. donkey1894 said:

    smoke you under the table and still be able to beat you mentally, physically, or spiritually. Silly cluck. You’re a jive-ass turkey and nothing more! REMEMBER my boast. I’ll smoke more weed than you could carry on your back and then proceed to defeat you in any and or all of the realms of the mental, physical or the spiritual. REMEMBER this day, when I clearly pointed out your jive, your anal, and your turkey like tendencies you jive-ass turkey. REMEMBER!

  94. i0olilovesalexa said:

    Assuming your better, smarter, more advanced then the next one kind of makes you worst then all others.

  95. benpocketful said:

    I’d ask a triathlete to “bike” because they are powerful from the upper and lower buddy. That’s very impressive.

  96. onedrop7 said:

    Toward the advancement of aeronautical engineering. I’m no engineer, but I do understand that learning to build lighter aircraft (or helicopters, in this case) that require less energy to power will ultimately lead to more efficient aircrafts — less fuel, pollution and dollars. The vehicle in the video is just a stepping stone in the process. It’s not expected to be practical.These kids and others like them are the best hope of American ingenuity. They should be applauded, not ridiculed.

  97. onedrop7 said:

    Sadly, the IQ and maturity level of the typical YouTube commenter is extremely low.This is an extraordinary breakthrough.

  98. Nje789 said:

    …implying they aren’t TRUE. Tell us then, how it could ever get past even two feet off the ground, that which it requires such close proximity to in order to work well at all? Hmmm?

  99. MrRhovanion said:

    these comments are ridiculous.i find them juvenile observations meant solely for derision ..like a bully at the clay table in kindergarten… .

  100. kerplunkboy said:

    of course not! People with your mental capacity will be part of the zombies horde before the end of the first day of the outbreak…

  101. TheThasik said:

    Meh. This really can’t be called a helicopter. More like a hovercraft. The ground is what keeps it up. Go a few feet higher and it’s worthless.

  102. cobrachoppergirl said:

    That’s not a helicopter, that’s a ground effect vehicle. It would never get more than a few feet off the ground on that power, once you got above ground effect.

  103. sallybaker1950 said:

    Someone needs to teach these folks about ground effect. It’s off the ground, but not really flying. Well I guess in a way it is, but in a way so is jumping and throwing a ball.

  104. spaceenergetics said:

    *Adjusts glasses* According to my calculations…power density required: w = sqrt((g^3 *M) / (rho*A)) [W/kg]M = total system mass [kg]g = gravitational constant [9.81 m/s2]rho = air density [1.20 kg/m3]So assuming you can create a craft large enough with limited human power density, it should be totally possible. Just about getting it to a size where specific lift energy is low enough…

  105. iToasterman said:

    I was expecting it to be a bit smaller… make this electric, give it a nice pod to protect you and make it waterproof and we have water walkers :D

  106. coasterpro said:

    My guess is that the craft was designed to take advantage of the ground effect, as others have mentioned. So a tri or quad rotor configuration was the only way to get the blades close enough to the ground to do this. A single blade sitting atop the cockpit wouldn’t be able to take advantage of the ground effect. The idea here is just to get the craft off the ground. Some other configuration will be needed for the height record.

  107. Jurgman blank said:

    Good example of a rotating wings in ground effect. ANY chance at it being able to get to 3 meters to get the prize? There was a human powered plane that flew helped by the ground effect before the gossamer albatross. It couldn’t make the hop to 3 meters to get the prize.Good luck tho om the 3 meter hop, and staying in the 20 meter square.

  108. bigredbob51 said:

    However I think ground effect plays a big part here, helps get it off the ground, but then not much higher. That will be the next challenge: More height and directional control.Great work so far though

  109. TVNarut0 said:

    para com isso, de que material isso é feito? papel? porque precisa ser incrivelmente leve para ele conseguir voar, com apenas essa velocidade das elices.

  110. AlphaSphere said:

    Would a different seating position be better? Maybe face down, kinda like on a sports bike…

Comments are closed.

Top

Subscribe to our free weekly email newsletter This Week in Composites

Get all the latest composite news direct to you inbox at the end of every week

We hate spam too and will never share your email with anyone